--And yes, to a reader here and there. I can't fully express my gratitude to those who visited, maybe even read, and even, believe it or not, commented on the entries. For those encouraging visits I am both thankful and humbled--not the least of which for that moment years ago when the late great Roger Ebert mentioned The Constant Viewer on his blog. Thanks, Roger; save me an aisle seat.
Before I sign off, let me direct you to a neglected project I started in 2013, The New Constant Viewer, which presents just one entry for each year of the Diary, beginning in 1895. I start, then stop, but always with the intention of moving on. If you send me an encouraging comment on the site I'll promise to get busy.
I'll close with some words from the Foreword of the old Constant Viewer, which I think still capture my abiding passion for the project and the never-ending story he refuses to remain un-viewed. Again, thanks for being Constant (or Intermittent) Viewers. I'll keep you posted on further stuff on my Facebook page (link on the right).
My relationship to this Diary is a lifelong, intimate one. In 1964 or so (I was about seven years old) I saw The Fly at a matinee, and I lay awake that night certain that, like Emily Dickinson, “I heard a Fly buzz,” and that Something was in the room with me. That something may well be this Diary, at once mysterious and exciting, a record of what may in the end be trivial--the act of moviegoing--but I’ve never let it go, I’ve kept it with me like a spare pair of eyeglasses you never really need but are happy to have--you know, in case you need to see something.
The Diary seems straightforward enough: The diarist goes to the movies, comes home, jots down impressions and associations and so on; but I find it difficult to describe exactly what he’s up to. Is he writing reviews? Reminiscences? Do the entries form a personal record, or, as with so many other diarists, is there a not-so-secret wish for it to be published as a public document? Well, as for the last, here I am publishing it; but what “it” is remains elusive. Maybe it’s simply a journal of seeing; the diarist is a moviegoer, and he writes to remember what he’s viewed. In doing so, he re-views it, so to speak, by lamplight and screenglow for a long time, and for a long time to come.
--Paul J. Marasa