May 28, 1964 [Le trou/The Night Watch]
When Jacques Becker died, he took with him the last remnants of un-ironic, quiet cool. His heroes lived in small worlds, hard to manage but easy to understand--and at the end he shrunk this down in Le trou to the title: a hole, worked at methodically, by hand.
One of the great physical joys is to pick up a hammer and bang away at something, chipping at it bit by bit, your arm like a metronome ticking off the blows, the pieces flying away, the thing broken down--or the hole widening. Becker trains his camera to stand there and watch the men make their patient getaway, the old soft concrete of the prison still tough, but eventually yielding--again, almost all of it on camera, staring for long minutes so we see the work done. It's a great movie about a prison break--but it is also the single most satisfying examination of real work I think I'll ever see outside of an instructional film--no, even better than that, because as instruction the film must simplify and cleanse the process; watching it builds your confidence that you can do it yourself. But with Becker's film it's dust and shards, and it instead builds suspense--and more pleasure than any instruction can offer, the child's pleasure--again, not only of breaking things (although a rock striking a pane of glass has its own satisfaction), but of making something--like all the prisoners' little tricks and gadgets, the jerry-rigged hour glass, the rags wrapped around improvised cutting tools, the elaborate devices for passing messages and rigging hinges--all these to build the most important thing: the hole, the widening opportunity for freedom.
--And that's all I care about; the end does not matter--of course, their escape matters to them, but I am merely the student, trained to remember only their arms swinging, over and over and over again. What more could any teacher wish, but to leave an indelible impression?
One of the great physical joys is to pick up a hammer and bang away at something, chipping at it bit by bit, your arm like a metronome ticking off the blows, the pieces flying away, the thing broken down--or the hole widening. Becker trains his camera to stand there and watch the men make their patient getaway, the old soft concrete of the prison still tough, but eventually yielding--again, almost all of it on camera, staring for long minutes so we see the work done. It's a great movie about a prison break--but it is also the single most satisfying examination of real work I think I'll ever see outside of an instructional film--no, even better than that, because as instruction the film must simplify and cleanse the process; watching it builds your confidence that you can do it yourself. But with Becker's film it's dust and shards, and it instead builds suspense--and more pleasure than any instruction can offer, the child's pleasure--again, not only of breaking things (although a rock striking a pane of glass has its own satisfaction), but of making something--like all the prisoners' little tricks and gadgets, the jerry-rigged hour glass, the rags wrapped around improvised cutting tools, the elaborate devices for passing messages and rigging hinges--all these to build the most important thing: the hole, the widening opportunity for freedom.
--And that's all I care about; the end does not matter--of course, their escape matters to them, but I am merely the student, trained to remember only their arms swinging, over and over and over again. What more could any teacher wish, but to leave an indelible impression?
Comments
Post a Comment