June 12, 1928 [The Lodger]

—But that’s not it; something else disrupts clarity: all those close-up faces, grimacing, fearful—even smiles dropping—“golden curls to-night” interrupting the images on the screen, repeated words—a warning, a promise. And the golden-curled girls pause, stare at the threat, laugh it off—but someone has to get it, we’ve been promised. There seems engrained into it a great excitement to be in control of everything—to change everything, to bend it all to some Will:
The lodger paces, and the people below look up at the ceiling and the swaying chandelier—and the ceiling becomes transparent so that we can watch him pace.
The lodger approaches the girl for a kiss, and his white face looms, fills the screen like spilled milk.
The suspicious suitor stares at the dirt at his feet, and sees his suspicions parade by.
Time and again, whatever is needed, happens, the sequence of images obedient to the characters' obsessions—and, it seems, the film itself, which urges our suspicions—then punishes more than rewards us for doing as we’re told. All it wants is our undivided attention, so it can satisfy and sicken us with murder—even giggling a bit, the strange man in the back who laughs while everyone else in the theater sniffs away tears. He loves to make us wait, and draws out the moment—almost until we think we’re watching a different picture—but not for long, the threat hanging always, like a rubber bat in a Dark Ride, part jest, part unwholesome preoccupation—Oh, look at the monster! we exclaim, glancing in the fun-house mirror.
This is the thing built, a seeming window that, the closer we get, closes, irises toward the white-faced lodger, the sudden victim—innocent after all, the wrong man accused, his darkness masking sorrow, not guilt—and so the lens advances upon us, the angry mob stuck in our seats and unable to turn away from our false conclusions that, again, the film insists we make—as transgressions.
Comments
Post a Comment