February 6, 1905 [The Kleptomaniac]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0b1d/d0b1dacf42d8ceb6e358471a4d15848b2123cffb" alt=""
But I worry that the cinema will take itself too "seriously"—not as art, but as arbiter. Or perhaps all I want is for the didactic to arrive with a little less finger-wagging and a bit more—what? Raising of fists? Anarchist snarls? Are social injustices a form of violence to be displayed violently? Or will louder voices simply mean more noise? I'm not sure if, like Hamlet's mother, I want "more matter, with less art" (given my own propensity for the purple, such a demand would seem more than a little disingenuous); but I'm getting as bored with cinematic sermons as I am with bad-boy pranks and card-tricks.
This mood arrives once more. Maybe I'm going to the cinema too often. On the other hand, I just heard some of Bela Bartok's Hungarian folk songs, and they almost broke my heart; and I can stare at a Monet haystack until it passes from abstraction to haystack and back again; and I believe I am on the verge of being able to do more than simply bear George Bernard Shaw. Do not puff yourself up, though: Your heart lies where it is, not in your head, and it will always be back to the moving picture-show for you. Raise your eyes, then, and keep watching. Everything will catch up with everything else, sooner or later.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdae3/fdae3b25816f89966697c880d9ed537a46fb7738" alt=""
Comments
Post a Comment